naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: "Real world" self-noise of BP4025? & noise

Subject: Re: "Real world" self-noise of BP4025? & noise
From: madl74
Date: Wed May 7, 2014 5:02 am ((PDT))
Magnus,

I forgot to discuss the audiograms. Mic noise is more audible in the
Kilohertz range, so you can ignore the house or other noises below 1KHz.

To get a cleaner noise graph, cover the mics with a pile of bedclothes whic=
h
will absorb the higher frequencies. The "thermal noise" of the vibrating ai=
r
molecules is the lowest noise you can get, and "excess noise" is the total=

air plus mic noise above that fundamental level. The theoretical minimum
"excess noise" would be 3dB as the air is vibrating on both sides of the mi=
c
diaphragm.

I have seen noise specs which were taken with the capsule disconnected.
These figures are meaningless.

Thermal noise rises with frequency, and sometimes shows up by rising on an=

audiogram above around 7KHz. This may be thermal noise in the mic, but an H=
F
tip-up means that you are at a low fundamental noise limit. The VP88 graph=

may show the start of thermal noise above 12KHz, which is promising.

David Brinicombe








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: "Real world" self-noise of BP4025? & noise, brini <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU