[Top] [All Lists]

Re: busmanaudio mods... is this serious?

Subject: Re: busmanaudio mods... is this serious?
From: "Luis do Carmo" lecarmo
Date: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:03 pm ((PST))
"If it is as good as my pro quality SQN mixer (...)"

It will never be. It's just going to sound better than the units we get str=
aight from Tascam, which are not bad at all.


On Friday, December 13, 2013 9:42 PM, "" <=> wrote:

> This modification provides much better detail and natural sound than the =
stock unit.

> The input capacitors are changed out for better values that allow for gre=
at bass response with an open sound and smooth high end that has excellent =


This is good advertising copy but doesn't mean much in technical sound
terms. I would expect any half decent digital recorder to give out what it=

takes in - with the exception of analogue noise from the pre-amps.

I am sure the mod lowers noise, but I would want quoted is what the input
conditions were, including powering, mic impedance etc.

What I would want to know is how the added noise from the recorder compares=

with the internal mic noise of my Sennheiser mics which this quote doesn't=

tell me. If it is as good as my pro quality SQN mixer, I would be tempted.=

David Brinicombe

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU