| Subject: | Re: Digital Compression - was New SSM |
|---|---|
| From: | "Peter Shute" pshute2 |
| Date: | Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:15 pm ((PDT)) |
On 20/07/2013, at 3:35 AM, "Robin" <<= nparmar.com>> wrote:=0D =0D In a good studio with proper isolation and excellent monitors, it is rather= difficult to tell the best MP3 streams (which are all I use) from uncompre= ssed PCM. On some sources, it's impossible. There are many studies.=0D =0D Robin, can you elaborate on what you mean by "the best MP3 streams"? Do you= mean any 320kbps, or are there good and bad versions of 320kbps?=0D =0D Peter Shute=0D |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Digital Compression - was New SSM, Robin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Digital Compression - was New SSM, jtudor2005 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Digital Compression - was New SSM, Robin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Digital Compression - was New SSM, jtudor2005 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU