[Top] [All Lists]

7. Re: Marantz PMD661 opinion please

Subject: 7. Re: Marantz PMD661 opinion please
From: "Max Catterwell" oatcruncher
Date: Wed Jun 5, 2013 8:26 am ((PDT))
Hi Jan
Just to say that I listened to your latest recording on my mobile, and was =
just astounded how good it sounded! It must be amazing over my studio setup=
, can't wait! I continue to wonder at your compositions, and get completely=
 lost in your soundscapes. Thank you

Jan Eerala <> wrote:

>I have the PMD661 and also the LS100. Both has a way too short battery
>life. I haven't
>measured, but I think one to one and half hour of recording/on is
>enough for both of these.
>The 661 is nicer to use and I imagine it having also better preamp.
>I've been searching for some solution to get longer battery life and
>found that there are
>big differences between AA - loadable batteries. Now I use Recyco-
>Eric, is there really Lithium AA-batteries with 1,5V ?  Will you tell
>what brand you have used?
>Jan Eerala, Finland
>"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
>sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
>Yahoo! Groups Links
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 7. Re: Marantz PMD661 opinion please, Max Catterwell <=

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU