[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Marantz PMD661 opinion please

Subject: Re: Marantz PMD661 opinion please
From: "Jez" tempjez
Date: Mon Jun 3, 2013 9:45 am ((PDT))
the 661 has ok pre-amps but not the quietest in this price range. If you st=
art with a zoom then just about anything else will be a big step up as they=
 have some of the noisiest pre-amps. The 661 is an ok recorder for sure, bu=
t there are plenty of folks who'll say you get more for your money with oth=
er recorders (good in-built mics, better power usage etc etc).

--- In  Tim Kahn <> wrote:
> I also have the 661 and I love it very much. I moved from the original H4=
. I purchased mine from Doug Oade ( with the "super mod" which sup=
posedly uses quieter pre-amps than the stock unit. I have never tried a sto=
ck unit so I can't say for sure there is a difference. I have used the 661 =
in a lot of different applications and conditions and except for 2 occasion=
s it has worked as it should.
> In the two occasions that it failed, it was raining very hard and the rec=
order got wet. It seems water can get between the buttons on the front pane=
l and cause erratic behavior (like a particular button is being pressed ove=
r and over rapidly, for example). In both cases I placed the recorder in my=
 food dehydrator, set on low, and left it to dry over night. Now it works p=
erfectly well again. I should add that in both cases the rain was extremely=
 heavy and I was in the rain for extended periods of time and I'm really su=
rprised that there was not more damage.
> My main complaint with it is that there are not two separate knobs for ga=
in adjustment. For a stereo pair where you only need to change the gain for=
 both at once its fine, but often I have two lav mics on people and it is a=
 two hand job to change the gain on one channel and almost always you will =
change the gain on the other as well. If you happen to have especially larg=
e fingers it might even be more annoying.
> But really, for me it has been an excellent recorder standing up to my pa=
rticular abuses very well.
> Here is a recording I am particularly fond of:
> Tim
> On Jun 1, 2013, at 10:17 PM, shooze53 wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> > I have a question regarding the quality and durability of the Marantz r=
ecorders. I have in the past owned the ZOOM H4n and Tascam DR100-mkII recor=
ders. Both have their strengths I suppose, but those strengths are not the =
durability of the switches and controls. The Tascam I had for approx. 6 mon=
ths, and it was suitable for some situations using onboard microphones, but=
 the rotary wheel started to fail, and the power switch was always a little=
 questionable from the very beginning. I returned it, unsatisfied.
> >
> > I am now considering purchase of the PMD661 Marantz recorder for field =
recording, (as well as other uses, ie. interview and live music recording) =
Does anyone have experience using the Marantz product? If so, any comments =
as to durability and ease of use, and sound quality would be very useful an=
d helpful in my decision to purchase.
> >
> > i am on a limited budget, but am willing to spend what is needed to obt=
ain both high grade audio, and durable hardware.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU