I have the same problem.
If I reply in gmail I never get an email with my reply.
So most of the time I use the "repy via web post" and that works better, bu=
t I didn't get an email the last time I replied a few days ago.
I'm now relying via web post so I will see if I get an email.
/H=C3=A5kan
--- In Eric Fassbender <> wrote:
>
> Thanks Peter,
>
> When I go on the website, I can see that my posts have gone through, howe=
ver, I do not receive them myself. I looked for a setting that turns on/off=
whether I receive my own messages, however, could not find anything. Has s=
omeone got an idea what it could be? Maybe I should check the Gmail spam fo=
lder ...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eric
>
>
> On 22/02/2013, at 8:12 AM, Peter Shute <> wrote:
>
> > I've received 7 list messages from you since 21/1/13, so some are certa=
inly getting through.
> >
> > All of those have similar send and receive date/times, so if you're mod=
erated then someone's approving your emails very quickly.
> >
> > Could it be that they are getting through, but you've somehow filtered =
out your own emails? I think some lists have the option to not send you bac=
k your own messages too.
> >
> > Peter Shute
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From:
> > > On Behalf Of Eric Fassbende=
r
> > > Sent: Friday, 22 February 2013 9:27 AM
> > > To:
> > > Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Is my equipment outdated?
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm just wondering if this is a moderated list? I've sent two
> > > messages to contribute to two separate topics and neither of
> > > them has showed up in the emails that I receive. I'm only new
> > > to this list and may be doing something wrong. It'd be great
> > > if someone had a suggestion for why my messages have not gone through=
.
> > >
> > > Much appreciated,
> > >
> > > Eric
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
|