naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

3. Re: Is my equipment outdated?

Subject: 3. Re: Is my equipment outdated?
From: "Eric Fassbender" eric.fassbender
Date: Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:27 pm ((PST))
Hi all,

I'm just wondering if this is a moderated list? I've sent two messages to c=
ontribute to two separate topics and neither of them has showed up in the e=
mails that I receive. I'm only new to this list and may be doing something =
wrong. It'd be great if someone had a suggestion for why my messages have n=
ot gone through.

Much appreciated,

Eric


On 22/02/2013, at 1:44 AM, John Crockett <> wrote:

> I'm afraid did not explain myself very clearly. I agree that a blimp is t=
he best solution, but I did think someone might have come up with some kind=
 of wind sock that is cheaper than a blimp and adequate in most conditions.
>
> The problem for others who might be considering buying an NT4 to be aware=
 of is that I have found the foam wind shield that comes with the NT4 to be=
 useless outside, because it fits very loosely around the microphone capsul=
es. Adding a furry thing that is designed to fit over the stock foam shield=
 is also useless because the whole thing remains open at the back and the f=
oam remains very loose. The slightest breeze swamps the capsules even with =
the furry thing in place, unless it is a very light breeze into which the m=
icrophone is directly facing.
>
> I have used exactly the same furry thing on my Zoom H2, with the stock fo=
am that comes with the H2, and it works perfectly because the foam has a co=
mplete, tight fit. But it is useless on the NT4 (for which it was supposedl=
y designed) because of the loose-fitting foam shield that comes with the mi=
crophone.
>
> I thought maybe someone had come up with a solution short of spending $30=
0 or more on a blimp, a sort of diy mini blimp for light-breezy conditions.=
 But perhaps not. The Rode Blimp works well, I just wish there were a less =
bulky alternative.
>
> John
>
> --- In  "Avocet" wrote:
> >
> > BTW the idea of a rear capsule windshield is not the solution as
> > cardioid mics have an pressure gradient sensitivity. That's why
> > cardioids are also bad for handling noise, and why vocal mics are
> > usually omni. There is no substitute for a large efficient blimp.
> > Nothing is more frusttrating than to have wind ruin an interesting
> > recording.
> >
> > David
> >
> > David Brinicombe
> > North Devon, UK
> > Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce
> >
>
>










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU