naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

5. Re: iRig pre

Subject: 5. Re: iRig pre
From: "Raimund" animalsounds
Date: Sun Jan 6, 2013 11:45 am ((PST))
Thank's for the clarification, Robb. I have never looked at th edetails of 
these products before. So, my inital guess was right...

Regards,
Raimund

> All low-cost preamps or DI boxes that I have ever seen just use a simple 
> inverting op amp circuit to mirror the the signal of the hot side of the 
> balanced signal (Pin 2 or tip of 1/4" balanced connection) onto the cold 
> (Pin 3 or ring) to get a balanced output. So the amplifier stage is 
> still single-ended.  And in fact some, like a little Mackie 402 mixer 
> that I use on my desk, don't even have a signal on the cold side of the 
> balanced line.  They are just impedance balanced.  So I don't understand 
> how there would be a noise penalty or any loss of signal content by just 
> using the hot side of the balanced output to feed an unbalanced input.
> 
> On 1/6/2013 9:52 AM, Raimund wrote:
> > Taking only one of the two (amplified) balanced output rails could 
> > still lead to a degradation of the noise performance. So, I believe 
> > that feeding the difference of the two into the unbanlanced input 
> > would be better in terms of noise.
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU