To: | |
---|---|
Subject: | Summary: [Nature Recordists] Re: EIN values and bits and peaks |
From: | Raimund <> |
Eric Benjamin wrote: You don't have to pull out your calculus > text book because I just did the calculation. > > for white noise in a 48 kHz bandwidth, A weighting reduces the measuremen= t by > 2.72 dB > for pink noise in a 48 kHz bandwidth, A weighting reduces the measurement= by > 3.70 dB Thanks for that. But do you really mean a bandwidth of 48 kHz? I ask that because I thought that the A-weighting curve is not defined for frequencies= above 20 kHz and if it was defined, then the attenuation should be quite st= rong at the (inaudible) ultrasonic frequencies above 20 kHz, wich should then le= ad to a significantly larger reduction than 2.7 or 3.7 dB. So, maybe you meant a= sample rate of 48 kHz or a bandwidth of 22 kHz? Regards, Raimund |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 4. Re: Summary: [Nature Recordists] Re: EIN values and bits and peaks, Eric Benjamin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 1. Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?, Klas Strandberg |
Previous by Thread: | Summary: [Nature Recordists] Re: EIN values and bits and peaks, Robin |
Next by Thread: | Bee ID From Recording, jasonpudd |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU