naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: EIN values and bits

Subject: Re: EIN values and bits
From: "Avocet" madl74
Date: Fri Dec 7, 2012 5:21 am ((PST))
> But if that conversion were to floating point rather than fixed
> point data, and then converted to fixed point after the attenuator,
> that would seem to be a valid way to get the signal in the right
> gain range for storage in a file.

Flawn,

The original floating point spec was to compress the signal down to 8
bits - three FP, four signal and one parity bit. That was a bit crude
and when 16 bit became practical, better compression algorithms became
available like MP3.

I'd like to know more about digital mixing, but with lots of bits
available, I presume you are saving mixing data along with the
original signal coding. A recorder with this facility wouldn't need
any input volume controls, but that almost applies now to 24 bit 
recording which theoretically has a 120dB signal to digital dither 
range. (24 bits minus parity bit minus 3 bits LSB dither)

David

David Brinicombe
North Devon, UK
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU