Subject: | Re: Background thumps in recording |
---|---|
From: | "Avocet" madl74 |
Date: | Tue Nov 6, 2012 5:43 am ((PST)) |
> Ah, me thinks RAAF Edinburgh 150+mi W is a far more likely > candidate. Keith, Artillery and shells at supersonic speeds produce sonic booms but at much lower energy levels than supersonic aircraft. Tou will never hear a boom directly in front of a plane because it will hit you first. :-) The boom trails out at an angle as a cone shaped pressure wave and quite a lot of the engine power goes into that perssure cone and it can travel many miles. Aircraft are not supposed to fly supersonic over UK land, so they practice over the sea. We get jets, probably from Wales, on a route between Exmoor and Dartmoor and they are just subsonic. You don't hear them coming, but when at low altitude, the sound level is very high. I haven't managed to record one yet. David David Brinicombe North Devon, UK Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce |
Previous by Date: | Re: Background thumps in recording, Keith Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Background thumps in recording, Klas Strandberg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Background thumps in recording, Keith Smith |
Next by Thread: | Re: Background thumps in recording, Klas Strandberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU