I assume the better separation is due to the type of capsule used, rather t=
han the separation.=0D
=0D
Didn't this thread start with Marco(?) presenting a comparison recording of=
the three recorders in the subject line? I still haven't had time to liste=
n to it.=0D
=0D
Peter Shute=0D
=0D
>-----Original Message-----=0D
>From: =0D
> On Behalf Of Gregory=0D
>O'Drobinak=0D
>Sent: Thursday, 19 July 2012 2:05 PM=0D
>To: =0D
>Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: Olympus LS5, LS7 and Sony M10=0D
>internal mics comparison.=0D
>=0D
>=0D
>=0D
>It is not possible to have a wide stereo spread with closely-spaced=0D
>mics.=0D
>=0D
>I can't believe that the LS-7 or LS-5 mics are that much farther apart=0D
>than that=0D
>of the M10.=0D
>=0D
>Perhaps someone could do a simultaneous recording with the M10 & the LS-=
=0D
>X=0D
>recorders at the same spot. I'd like to hear the difference.=0D
>=0D
>Thanks!=0D
>=0D
>- G=0D
>=0D
>________________________________=0D
>From: Peter Shute < <pshute%40nuw.org.au> >=0D
>To: "=0D
><naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.com> "=0D
><=0D
><naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.com> >=0D
>Sent: Wed, July 18, 2012 8:19:00 PM=0D
>Subject: RE: [Nature Recordists] Re: Olympus LS5, LS7 and Sony M10=0D
>internal mics=0D
>comparison.=0D
>=0D
>The original problem was that John Crockett wants a recorder like the=0D
>M10 but=0D
>with a stereo image like an LS-7 or LS-5. If the M10 is to be made=0D
>suitable by=0D
>adding external mics then they need to be in a really tiny package.=0D
>=0D
>Peter Shute=0D
|