s
comparison.
For the sake of understanding values or risks of Mid-Side processing.
Here is a URL to a bit of my urban backyard test with the pcm-m10.
The first part has no added EQ, the second part has Mid-Side processing to=
correct the stereo image.
http://soundcloud.com/john-hartog/jh-test20127017-pcmm10-ms/s-TnZrf
Any comments are welcome.
John Hartog
rockscallop.org
--- In "rock_scallop" <> w=
rote:
>
> Hi Robin,
> It is always nice when post-processing is not needed, but show me an exte=
rnal
>array for nature recording that will not benefit from some post EQ most of=
the
>time.
>
>
> Of course one must be careful not to over do it.
>
> What do you mean by "skew your phase and introduce other distortions." If=
it
>sounds good, is it not good?
>
> John Hartog
> rockscallop.org
>
>
>
> --- In "robin_parmar_sound" <robin@> wr=
ote:
> >
> > John wrote:
> >
> > > On the other hand, the advantage of the lower noise mics in the M10 i=
s the
>potential for an extended acoustic horizon in quieter settings, and for th=
ose
>capable of making MS adjustments in post that might make a difference.
> >
> > Of course the best thing to do is use external mics when low noise is o=
f
>paramount importance. Then you can control the recording topology exactly,=
>without resorting to post-processing that will skew your phase and introdu=
ce
>other distortions.
> >
> > -- Robin Parmar
> >
>
|