naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: artifact in spectrogram created using Raven

Subject: Re: artifact in spectrogram created using Raven
From: "John Crockett" naturalcontemplative
Date: Sun Jul 15, 2012 7:21 pm ((PDT))
Hi Laura,

Nice to hear from you! Vicki is probably right because it is so pronounced,=
 but I have seen a similar effect using manual recording where strong signa=
ls are involved - like from a shotgun or parabola. You could try reducing t=
he contrast and/or brightness settings for the sonogram and see if the back=
ground emerges.

Not that I understand it, because I don't!

John Crockett
Westminster, Vermont

--- In  vickipowys <> wrote:
>
> Hi Laura,
>
> Welcome to the group!
>
> I think you had the Automatic Gain Control turned ON, for your
> recorder.  For nature recording you should always use Manual Gain,
> set it at a fixed level so that the wanted sounds do not clip.  Auto
> gain gives a noise pumping effect, every time a bird calls the gain
> quickly goes down, then gradually up again.  This is how the Raven
> jpg looks to me.
>
> However there was no sound sample in the Nelson's Sparrow folder, to
> test my theory.
>
> Assuming you are studying different dialects rather than relative
> loudness, your sound files should be useable although there may be
> some clipping at the start of a birdcall, before the auto gain kicks in.
>
> What recorder were you using, and what microphone/s?
>
>
>
> Vicki Powys
> Australia
>
>
>
> On 16/07/2012, at 10:11 AM, laura.hilberg wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I haven't posted here before, but I've been following this forum
> > for a few months now. I am finishing up my Master's degree in
> > conservation biology, and my thesis is a dialect study of the
> > Nelson's Sparrow (found on the coast of New England and inland from =

> > North Dakota up through interior Canada).
> >
> > I just returned from my field season, recording sparrows in
> > multiple locations in Maine. I'll be analyzing my recordings using
> > Raven, and one of the first things I noticed when I opened it up
> > was a strange white space underneath the song, which roughly
> > correlates with amplitude and pitch. It looks like a white echo - a =

> > silent space in a background otherwise full of traffic and wind
> > noise. Since I know that the traffic and wind noise didn't
> > disappear, I'm assuming that it is not really there? "I uploaded a
> > picture and sound clip in the "File" section of the Yahoo Group in
> > a folder called "Nelson's Sparrow").
> >
> > The white space is always there to some degree, but it is much more =

> > extreme in the loud songs, in which I can also hear a little bit of =

> > a bubbling sound (hard to describe). My only idea is that my gain
> > was turned up too high and that distorted the sound at times?
> >
> > I realize that I don't have all the right vocabulary or a deep
> > understanding so this might be hard to follow - does anyone have
> > any thoughts or ideas?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Laura H.
> >
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU