naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

1. Re: Foam for SASS foam info

Subject: 1. Re: Foam for SASS foam info
From: "John Crockett" naturalcontemplative
Date: Sun Jul 15, 2012 5:33 am ((PDT))
Hi Vicki,

The error is entirely mine. My original measurement of the scrap I bought w=
as inaccurate. I don't know how I managed that. The actual dimensions of my=
 green foam are 4 x 6.5 x 12 inches, which I work out to 1.5 pounds per cub=
ic foot. I'm confident in the weight of 125 grams as I was using an accurat=
e lab scale.

I haven't found an affordable scrap of anything more dense yet.

I purchased my green foam from Jo-Ann Fabric, a national chain.

http://www.joann.com/airtex-foam-chairpads-2-high-density/xprd780100/

It is made by Airtex, but I cannot find any specs for the foam on the Airte=
x site. Jo-Ann sell it by the foot in many thicknesses (only one example on=
line), and have off-cut scraps in the store.

I doubt it is ideal but it is all I can find around here.

John Crockett
Westminster, Vermont

--- In  vickipowys <> wrote:
>
> Re the foam:
>
> I am puzzled, how can John Crockett's green foam be specified at 1.5
> pounds per cubic foot, if his scrap green piece 4 x 6 x 9 inches
> weighing 125 grams would, as a cubic foot, actually equal around 2.2
> pounds?  (if I did my maths right :-)
>
> John's green foam piece was approx. the same weight-for-size as my
> grey piece.
>
> The original Crown SASS foam weighs the same as my grey piece.
>
> Rob Danielson was using 1.5 to 1.7 pounds per cubic foot density foam.
>
> I guess it is hard to accurately weigh a small piece of foam, so
> maybe some variations have occurred because of that.
>
> But if the weights of the smaller pieces was accurate, then this
> suggests John Hartog's link to the Grainger charcoal foam of 2 pounds =

> per cubic foot would be the closest match to the original Crown SASS
> foam.
>
>
> Vicki Powys
> Australia
>
>
>
>
>
>
> John Crockett wrote:
>
> > BTW, my green foam, at 1.5 lbs per cubic foot density, is similar
> > to the foam linked to on the diyboundarymic blog. So maybe it is
> > the "right" stuff. Just not identical to what Crown is using, which =

> > may be proprietary.
> > On 12/07/2012, at 2:08 AM, John Crockett wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi Vicki,
> >>
> >> The foam I am able to find locally is green (whatever that means!).
> >> It is called high-density foam (they also sell "regular" density,
> >> which is white), and although the clerks in the store had no idea
> >> about open or closed cell, it is absorbent like a sponge, so I
> >> guess it is open-cell. It isn't nearly as dense as I expected, less
> >> so, I think, than the foam mattress pad I mentioned. It is quite
> >> squishy. The 4" x 6" x 9" scrap I bought weighs 125 grams.
> >>
> >> Could I possibly have the right thing? I can return it if I bought
> >> the wrong material, but how can I tell? Does anyone know?
> >>
> >> Many thanks,
> >>
> >> John Crockett
> >> Westminster, Vermont
> >>
> >
> On 15/07/2012, at 6:05 AM, hartogj wrote:
>
> > The price $45.12 suggests the charcoal firm.
> >
> > I notice the charcoal firm at foamforyou.com is density is 1.5-1.7
> > lbs./cu.ft.  The grainger.com charcoal sheet that I previously
> > linked to is 3 lbs./cu.ft. Grainger also lists 2 lbs./cu.ft
> > charcoal sheets, and 1.45 lbs./cu.ft balls and cubes.
> >
> > John Hartog
> > rockscallop.org
> >
> > --- In  Peter Shute <pshute@>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> It works ok as http://www.foamforyou.com/charcoal_foam.htm#
> >> Charcoal (I removed one space, hopefully the list doesn't put it
> >> right back again).
> >>
> >> There are two densities of charcoal foam, and that both are listed =

> >> as suitable for noise treatment and packaging. Which one?
> >>
> >> Can anyone see anything on the specs page that distinguishes these =

> >> from the other foams, apart from colour? They aren't the densest.
> >> Maybe low resilience?
> >>
> >> Peter Shute
> >>
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU