Subject: | 4. Re: Foam for SASS |
---|---|
From: | "John Crockett" naturalcontemplative |
Date: | Thu Jul 12, 2012 4:13 pm ((PDT)) |
Hmmm. By this test, my green foam fails. Using a SPL meter, I am measuring = about 1dB per inch attenuation of a 2 kHz signal. Maybe I need to keep look= ing for the right foam. I'm not confident this green stuff is going to adeq= uately separate the channels. John Crockett Westminster, Vermont --- In Paul Jacobson <> wrote: > > The SASS patent indicates that the foam for the nose should attenuate fre= quencies above 1200hz by at least 3dB per inch. All you need to do is test = for that property. > > cheers > Paul > > On 12/07/2012, at 5:42 AM, Peter Shute wrote: > > > > > It would be good if someone could come up with an objective test for id= entifying this stuff. I was told I should be able to blow through it, but w= ith more difficulty than with medium density foam, which I wouldn't call an= objective test unless I had several samples to compare. > > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 3. Op Ed on soundscapes in Sunday's New York Times, Bernie Krause |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 5. Re: Foam for SASS, Peter Shute |
Previous by Thread: | 3. Op Ed on soundscapes in Sunday's New York Times, Bernie Krause |
Next by Thread: | 5. Re: Foam for SASS, Peter Shute |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU