Subject: | Re: Foam for SASS |
---|---|
From: | "Peter Shute" pshute2 |
Date: | Wed Jul 11, 2012 8:49 pm ((PDT)) |
In the shop?=0D =0D Peter Shute=0D =0D =0D --------------------------=0D Sent using BlackBerry=0D =0D ________________________________=0D From: =0D To: =0D Sent: Thu Jul 12 10:52:19 2012=0D Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Foam for SASS=0D =0D =0D =0D The SASS patent indicates that the foam for the nose should attenuate frequ= encies above 1200hz by at least 3dB per inch. All you need to do is test fo= r that property.=0D =0D cheers=0D Paul=0D =0D On 12/07/2012, at 5:42 AM, Peter Shute wrote:=0D =0D >=0D > It would be good if someone could come up with an objective test for iden= tifying this stuff. I was told I should be able to blow through it, but wit= h more difficulty than with medium density foam, which I wouldn't call an o= bjective test unless I had several samples to compare.=0D =0D =0D =0D =0D |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Foam for SASS, Paul Jacobson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Urban Noise killing young birds, chrishails50 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Foam for SASS, Paul Jacobson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Foam for SASS, vickipowys |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU