[Top] [All Lists]

10. Re: R-44 issue-geek reply

Subject: 10. Re: R-44 issue-geek reply
From: "Jez" tempjez
Date: Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:45 pm ((PDT))

in that case I remain somewhat puzzled - the Roland recorders aren't cheap =
& tacky units. Why they should have not such good design is odd indeed.

--- In  "Raimund" <> wrot=
> > Hi Raimund,
> >
> > perhaps, at least to answer some of the frustration & puzzlement about =
this issue, could you let us all know if any other recorders at the pro-sum=
er or entry level have the same kind of issues
> No, I still have not tested any other recorder regarding that issue...
> > & more to the point perhaps, why even if they do they appear to be able=
 to handle the DPA's ok ? thats the bit I can't get my head round.
> Other recorders obviously have more carefully designed phantom power supp=
> I have currently no access to the original phantom power DIN or IEC speci=
fications, but I guess that it is allowed that the phantom power supply car=
ries a certain amount of ripple (may be up to 1 mV). If that was true, then=
 the Roland recorders would probably still satisfy the standard. I just rea=
d about these things on the Schoeps website (there is obviously no English =
> Regards,
> Raimund

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU