[Top] [All Lists]

1. Re: R-44 issue

Subject: 1. Re: R-44 issue
From: "robin_parmar_sound" robin_parmar_soun=
Date: Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:25 am ((PDT))

Jez wrote:

> thanks Robin, I knew of this test (which by the way has different results=
 from quite a few others). I've used all the other recorders & actually the=
 R-44 has a lower self noise than the FR2LE & the PMD661 for example - but =
there is a knack to getting the gain & sensitivity knob in the right positi=
ons for optimum performance.

I would like to know more about this, since I have not read much disagreeme=
nt with the tests I referenced. Would love to be better informed!

I confess to being surprised that the noise would be lower than the FR-2LE,=
 which is already at Sound Devices quality. Some of my recordings are alrea=
dy right at the limits of what is audible / possible, IMO.

-- Robin Parmar

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU