naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

13. Re: Mixing using Headphones

Subject: 13. Re: Mixing using Headphones
From: "soundings23" soundings23
Date: Wed May 30, 2012 11:06 am ((PDT))
Good to know, thank you

--- In  "Jez" <> wrote:
>
> makes sense totally & I think these questions are in the minds of a lot o=
f folks who record & choose to make 'work' available in some way.
>
>
>
> --- In  "soundings23" <tony.whitehead233=
2@> wrote:
> >
> > Interesting you talk of transformations.
> >
> > A blackbird is singing
> >
> > First I listen to it, try to hear the sounds
> >
> > But, and without thought for re-presentation I transform it, it gets a =
context as I'm listening. Sometimes this happens immediately. Sometimes, es=
pecially if its not something for which have a label to hand, I can hold on=
 to the listening for a while before I transform it. I like that.
> >
> > I then consider re-presenting it.
> >
> > I could record it with high quality audio equipment - and this would tr=
ansform it again, and indeed it would add not just to the original sound, b=
ut give it an additional context (eg I am using expensive equipment to tran=
sform this)
> >
> > Or I could transform it in a multitude of other ways. I could describe =
it in words, draw it, paint it - and each of these would add something extr=
a of me and my context to it.
> >
> > Which raises interesting questions over why one form of re-presentation=
 might be privileged over another.
> >
> > I can then share these with other people - which adds yet another conte=
xt to the original sound - why am I sharing it? Am I claiming it is an arti=
stic process? Or a scientific process? Or both? People who receive this the=
n get a distant reference to the original sound, and a whole bundle more ab=
out me and the world in which I live.
> >
> > Which, as its such a convoluted process, makes me think if I want to sh=
are it the best thing to do is simply take people to listen to the sound it=
self and have done with the re-presentation.
> >
> > And  listen for as long as possible with naming it
> >
> > Does any of that make any sense? Not sure I have a point - just some th=
oughts really
> >
> > T :)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In  "Jez" <tempjez@> wrote:
> > >
> > > It is often hard on forums to fully grasp what is implied by what is =
written & so, hoping i've not misunderstood the intent:
> > >
> > > when it comes to field recordings use in a creative context (sound ar=
t, improvisation, music etc etc), just as with any element there are always=
 (subjective) questions of quality or at least some kind of commitment to t=
he content - either focused or from a different artistic viewpoint. Everyth=
ing is transformed when we get involved, to a lesser or greater extent. All=
 of my comments on this subject have been related to the idea of an 'ideal'=
 or a 'right' way to do things - which is, imo, can be a closing down of op=
enness. As with all things there are good & not so good.
> > >
> > > Mix & edit wherever & however works for each person - but I stick to =
my point that attempting to build a neutral, acoustically tuned space might=
 assist you in your process but it doesn't & can't guarantee that the end r=
esult will be 'better' or will communicate in some certain way to listeners=
. Sound might be able to be explained by science but our response & connect=
ion to it isn't.
> > >
> > > --- In  Bernie Krause <chirp@> wrote=
:
> > > >
> > > > Not sure if the late John Cage carries any weight in this forum.  B=
ut,
> > > > for what it's worth (I think it's been posted before), here's his t=
ake
> > > > on the matter since it has been a kind of false debate since the ou=
tset:
> > > >
> > > > In a "so what?" moment, John Cage best addressed the question of =

> > > > editing natural soundscape recordings at a sound arts conference he=
ld
> > > > at Skywalker Ranch (Lucasfilm) in Marin County in 1989. After being=

> > > > asked a direct question on the matter, he responded, "Attempts to =

> > > > replicate or capture aspects of the natural world without amendment=

> > > > speak clearly to a vision of paralysis and death=85The recording of=

> > > > sound [taking it out of one context and transferring it to another =

> > > > medium] simply cannot be done without some element of transformatio=
n."
> > > > He went on to say, kind of irritated by the gullibility of the
> > > > question that while a clip may be spectacular, good, dramatic,
> > > > delightful, or compelling, by the criteria of multiple capture
> > > > choices, alone, not one single recording he had ever heard from any=

> > > > source was or is an actual representation of the original. By it's =

> > > > very nature the recording of sound is transformative (decontextuali=
zed
> > > > or abstracted). So, it follows logically, aesthetically, emotionall=
y,
> > > > historically, philosophically, technically etc., etc., that there's=
 no
> > > > such animal as an unadulterated recorded sound. When he said that, =
for
> > > > most of those within earshot, it was as if everything finally becam=
e
> > > > clear and all those straw men and red herrings suddenly went extinc=
t.
> > > > Show me a "pure" recording by that definition, and in addition to t=
he
> > > > live baby wooly mammoth I'll send to you via Federal Express, I'll =

> > > > introduce you to the Virgin Mary as she materializes in full 3-D =

> > > > splendor from the image of a cheddar cheese sandwich in our nearby =
deli.
> > > >
> > > > Bernie Krause
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On May 28, 2012, at 1:48 PM, Jez wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > yes - that is part of my point indeed.
> > > > >
> > > > > sadly, there is a lot of 'sound art' that falls short of having b=
een
> > > > > created through listening in a meaningful way. This is a problem =

> > > > > with all kinds of roots, not least being that curators by & large=

> > > > > have had no interest in creative music / sound exploration in the=
ir
> > > > > own listening habits & therefore often program work that is of po=
or
> > > > > quality or simply repeats work done for many years by others. I =

> > > > > could (but will refrain) name quite a few fairly well established=

> > > > > 'sound artists' who, in private, admit they don't care much about=

> > > > > sound & just view the art form as an easy way to get funding or =

> > > > > exhibition opportunities. The problem is that there are still not=

> > > > > enough people involved at a certain level who can spot the player=
s
> > > > > or know enough about the history of explorative sound to be able =
to
> > > > > recognise original approaches.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In  "hartogj"
> > > > > <hartogj_1999@> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi Jez,
> > > > >> Your point of view is clearer to me now.  When it comes to creat=
ive
> > > > >> processes there are infinite possibilities.  I would say any sou=
nd
> > > > >> art requires careful listening - it is not sound art after all =

> > > > >> until someone takes care to listen to it.  Regarding nature soun=
d
> > > > >> recording as sound art, there is no reason to limit the form to =
any
> > > > >> specific medium. I might consider wax crayon on cardboard a natu=
re
> > > > >> sound recording where it is evocative of natural sound.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> John Hartog
> > > > >> rockscallop.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --- In  "Jez" <tempjez@> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> what about the opinions of 'experts' that differ from that ? Fo=
r
> > > > >>> me this is the point - that it is the material that matters & l=
ike
> > > > >>> it or not the music / sound that we respond to is made, mixed &=

> > > > >>> edited in all kinds of different spaces - with or without
> > > > >>> headphones & with a wide range of speakers.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I'm all for quality of course, but this is an individual choice=
. I
> > > > >>> have good speakers (a few different pairs in different rooms) &=
 a
> > > > >>> pair of good headphones - the same pair I use in the field.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> As i've said before, I don't have any issues with anyone who =

> > > > >>> chooses to build a studio space or an acoustically treated spac=
e -
> > > > >>> each to their own of course, but in 35 years of involvement & =

> > > > >>> interest in field recording in its many different forms & on al=
l
> > > > >>> levels, it has been proved to me over & over again that materia=
l
> > > > >>> can communicate even if its been mixed in less than what some =

> > > > >>> folks would describe as 'ideal' circumstances. I think my conce=
rns
> > > > >>> when any aspects of a craft or art form gets herded towards som=
e
> > > > >>> 'ideal' is that what happens is, whilst precision becomes more =

> > > > >>> achievable to more people, things tend to edge towards a
> > > > >>> mainstream, middle of the road approach & less personal.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Perhaps one of the difficulties with this conversation on this =

> > > > >>> particular group is that a large number of members are mainly =

> > > > >>> interested in the, technically, 'best' recording of a certain =

> > > > >>> species or environment. For many people however, whilst getting=

> > > > >>> good & powerfully eloquent recordings is a focus, what they are=

> > > > >>> aiming for is an emotive or creative impression of the location=
.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> We are talking about something that isn't set in stone here & I=

> > > > >>> think for me I find it both interesting & I confess a bit puzzl=
ing
> > > > >>> that anyone would take pleasure in listening to bird song (for =

> > > > >>> example) in the 'real' world & then take a recording of the sam=
e
> > > > >>> back to a studio setting & try to 'perfect' the sound of the =

> > > > >>> recording. Its a personal view point of course but to me we =

> > > > >>> already know that we can't capture a 'neutral' recording - they=

> > > > >>> are always coloured by mic, recorder choice etc & therefore, if=

> > > > >>> one lets go of that to some degree, what becomes more interesti=
ng
> > > > >>> is capturing something of the experience of being in that locat=
ion
> > > > >>> at that time.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> When it comes to editing (& I should declare here that it has b=
een
> > > > >>> my approach for some time to do not processing - I top & tail &=
 on
> > > > >>> rare occasions might eq out some hiss if the mic used has not =

> > > > >>> performed as i'd have liked, but thats it) I do this on headpho=
nes
> > > > >>> simply because i'm listening for any 'problems' - ie. not natur=
al
> > > > >>> or man made sounds in the location but mic pops or other such =

> > > > >>> issues. I tend to live with recordings for some time before I d=
o
> > > > >>> anything public with them & therefore I would guess that the wa=
y I
> > > > >>> 'listen' to them critically for the most part involves playing =

> > > > >>> them back on the same system I listen to every day.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> so, back to the advice of experts bit & with the understanding =

> > > > >>> that this is another can of worms, what's an expert ? & what =

> > > > >>> happens when some say one thing & others say another ? I know w=
ere
> > > > >>> discussing fine hairs here but, for example, I sometimes get =

> > > > >>> referred to as an expert in field recording & I always say i'm =

> > > > >>> not  because we are all engaged with listening to a world we do=
n't
> > > > >>> control. We can gather knowledge of course but the moment we =

> > > > >>> assume we know exactly what we're doing is the moment we've los=
t
> > > > >>> the most important point - to let go of our human need to
> > > > >>> dominate, control & make assumptions of what is / will happen &=

> > > > >>> instead engage more closely with the listening & the simple act=
 of
> > > > >>> being in a place for a period of time. Expert - urghh. We're no=
t
> > > > >>> plumbing in a sink here :)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> --- In  "hartogj" <hartogj_199=
9@>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> The definition of "mixing" was confusing from the beginning of=

> > > > >>>> this muddy thread.
> > > > >>>> Is mixing limited to only the combining of separate sounds or =

> > > > >>>> tracks, or is the meaning extended to include other post
> > > > >>>> production processing techniques that may be applied to an =

> > > > >>>> original recording?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> For critical analysis and fine adjustments of any recording, I=

> > > > >>>> will go along with the experts on this group who have in the p=
ast
> > > > >>>> many times recommended good monitors and good headphones, and =
an
> > > > >>>> acoustically treated space.  Listening with two more different=

> > > > >>>> pairs of good headphones is better than using only one pair.  =
I
> > > > >>>> liked Bernie's description of his studio made without parallel=

> > > > >>>> walls or ceiling.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> John Hartog
> > > > >>>> rockscallop.org
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> > > > > sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie=

> > > > > Krause.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Wild Sanctuary
> > > > POB 536
> > > > Glen Ellen, CA 95442
> > > > 707-996-6677
> > > > http://www.wildsanctuary.com
> > > > chirp@
> > > > Google Earth zooms: http://earth.wildsanctuary.com
> > > > SKYPE: biophony
> > > > FaceBook:
> > > > http://www.facebook.com/TheGreatAnimalOrchestra
> > > > http://www.facebook.com/BernieKrauseAuthor
> > > > Twitter:
> > > > http://www.twitter.com/berniekrause
> > > > YouTube:
> > > > https://www.youtube.com/BernieKrauseTV
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU