naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

4. Re: Mixing using Headphones

Subject: 4. Re: Mixing using Headphones
From: "Peter Shute" pshute2
Date: Mon May 28, 2012 2:55 pm ((PDT))
"This is a problem with all kinds of roots ..."

What do you mean by "roots", Jez?

Peter Shute


From:  =
.com] On Behalf Of Jez
Sent: Tuesday, 29 May 2012 6:48 AM
To: 
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Mixing using Headphones



yes - that is part of my point indeed.

sadly, there is a lot of 'sound art' that falls short of having been create=
d through listening in a meaningful way. This is a problem with all kinds o=
f roots, not least being that curators by & large have had no interest in c=
reative music / sound exploration in their own listening habits & therefore=
 often program work that is of poor quality or simply repeats work done for=
 many years by others. I could (but will refrain) name quite a few fairly w=
ell established 'sound artists' who, in private, admit they don't care much=
 about sound & just view the art form as an easy way to get funding or exhi=
bition opportunities. The problem is that there are still not enough people=
 involved at a certain level who can spot the players or know enough about =
the history of explorative sound to be able to recognise original approache=
s.

--- In <naturerecordists%40yahoogrou=
ps.com>, "hartogj" <> wrote:
>
> Hi Jez,
> Your point of view is clearer to me now. When it comes to creative proces=
ses there are infinite possibilities. I would say any sound art requires ca=
reful listening - it is not sound art after all until someone takes care to=
 listen to it. Regarding nature sound recording as sound art, there is no r=
eason to limit the form to any specific medium. I might consider wax crayon=
 on cardboard a nature sound recording where it is evocative of natural sou=
nd.
>
> John Hartog
> rockscallop.org
>
>
> --- In <naturerecordists%40yahoogr=
oups.com>, "Jez" <tempjez@> wrote:
> >
> > what about the opinions of 'experts' that differ from that ? For me thi=
s is the point - that it is the material that matters & like it or not the =
music / sound that we respond to is made, mixed & edited in all kinds of di=
fferent spaces - with or without headphones & with a wide range of speakers=
.
> >
> > I'm all for quality of course, but this is an individual choice. I have=
 good speakers (a few different pairs in different rooms) & a pair of good =
headphones - the same pair I use in the field.
> >
> > As i've said before, I don't have any issues with anyone who chooses to=
 build a studio space or an acoustically treated space - each to their own =
of course, but in 35 years of involvement & interest in field recording in =
its many different forms & on all levels, it has been proved to me over & o=
ver again that material can communicate even if its been mixed in less than=
 what some folks would describe as 'ideal' circumstances. I think my concer=
ns when any aspects of a craft or art form gets herded towards some 'ideal'=
 is that what happens is, whilst precision becomes more achievable to more =
people, things tend to edge towards a mainstream, middle of the road approa=
ch & less personal.
> >
> > Perhaps one of the difficulties with this conversation on this particul=
ar group is that a large number of members are mainly interested in the, te=
chnically, 'best' recording of a certain species or environment. For many p=
eople however, whilst getting good & powerfully eloquent recordings is a fo=
cus, what they are aiming for is an emotive or creative impression of the l=
ocation.
> >
> > We are talking about something that isn't set in stone here & I think f=
or me I find it both interesting & I confess a bit puzzling that anyone wou=
ld take pleasure in listening to bird song (for example) in the 'real' worl=
d & then take a recording of the same back to a studio setting & try to 'pe=
rfect' the sound of the recording. Its a personal view point of course but =
to me we already know that we can't capture a 'neutral' recording - they ar=
e always coloured by mic, recorder choice etc & therefore, if one lets go o=
f that to some degree, what becomes more interesting is capturing something=
 of the experience of being in that location at that time.
> >
> > When it comes to editing (& I should declare here that it has been my a=
pproach for some time to do not processing - I top & tail & on rare occasio=
ns might eq out some hiss if the mic used has not performed as i'd have lik=
ed, but thats it) I do this on headphones simply because i'm listening for =
any 'problems' - ie. not natural or man made sounds in the location but mic=
 pops or other such issues. I tend to live with recordings for some time be=
fore I do anything public with them & therefore I would guess that the way =
I 'listen' to them critically for the most part involves playing them back =
on the same system I listen to every day.
> >
> > so, back to the advice of experts bit & with the understanding that thi=
s is another can of worms, what's an expert ? & what happens when some say =
one thing & others say another ? I know were discussing fine hairs here but=
, for example, I sometimes get referred to as an expert in field recording =
& I always say i'm not because we are all engaged with listening to a world=
 we don't control. We can gather knowledge of course but the moment we assu=
me we know exactly what we're doing is the moment we've lost the most impor=
tant point - to let go of our human need to dominate, control & make assump=
tions of what is / will happen & instead engage more closely with the liste=
ning & the simple act of being in a place for a period of time. Expert - ur=
ghh. We're not plumbing in a sink here :)
> >
> > --- In <naturerecordists%40yahoo=
groups.com>, "hartogj" <hartogj_1999@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The definition of "mixing" was confusing from the beginning of this m=
uddy thread.
> > > Is mixing limited to only the combining of separate sounds or tracks,=
 or is the meaning extended to include other post production processing tec=
hniques that may be applied to an original recording?
> > >
> > > For critical analysis and fine adjustments of any recording, I will g=
o along with the experts on this group who have in the past many times reco=
mmended good monitors and good headphones, and an acoustically treated spac=
e. Listening with two more different pairs of good headphones is better tha=
n using only one pair. I liked Bernie's description of his studio made with=
out parallel walls or ceiling.
> > >
> > > John Hartog
> > > rockscallop.org
> > >
> >
>










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU