naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Hydrophones and depth

Subject: Re: Hydrophones and depth
From: "soundings23" soundings23
Date: Thu May 10, 2012 2:33 pm ((PDT))
Fascinating, thanks Mitch. I like the idea of an aquatic audio "channel".


--- In  Mitch Hill <> wrote:
>
> On 5/10/2012 3:45 PM, soundings23 wrote:
> > Doing some more hydrophone recordings today. Just a thought ... does de=
pth affect the sound?  I'd kind of expect it too, at greater pressure I'd i=
magine sound to travel differently in what is a denser medium (if that's th=
e right way to describe it)?
> >
> > Tony
> >
> >
> Fundamentally, depth alone does not affect sound, however there are some=

> unique effects of depth that can alter the path sound takes to get to
> the hydrophone, primarily what is refereed to in oceanography as the
> "Thermocline", a level at which temperature of the surface waters and
> temperature of waters of the deep ocean go through a transition or
> inversion and act as a mirror to sound.  This zone can be also used to
> advantage as a channel that can carry underwater sound great distances.
>
> However the thermocline is at greater depths than most of us need be
> concerned about it, typically below 600 feet.
>
> Another concern is the air/water interface which also acts as a mirror
> to sound, as is a very flat clean bottom such as a sand flat which will
> also act as a sound mirror.
>
> --
> --
> Mitch Hill
>
> (Sent from HP DV6T)
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU