naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

AT3032/MX391 Dawn Chorus Comparison

Subject: AT3032/MX391 Dawn Chorus Comparison
From: "tk7859" tk7859
Date: Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:15 am ((PDT))

I took the opportunity to record last Sunday's dawn chorus (90minutes befor=
e dawn in fact) during a period of good weather with very light winds.  The=
re were only a few early flights heading to/from the London airports and ve=
ry light road traffic so background noise was reasonable apart from the sou=
nd of neighbours' heating furnaces switching in and out.

The AT 3032s were fed to a Marantz 661 and the Shure MX391s to an Olympus L=
S-10.  Both sets of mics were mounted on nearly identical head spaced bound=
ary rigs i.e. those shown in the photographs here

https://picasaweb.google.com/G0SBW.PM/AT3032MX391BeachTestFebruary142012?au=
thuser=3D0&feat=3Ddirectlink

The same 90 seconds of time from the 3032 and MX391 recordings have been jo=
ined together; with the 3032 going first.  These snippets are of from the l=
ast third of the dawn chorus.

No wind protection was used and a small amount of wind rumble can be heard =
in a couple of places.  The recordings were made 48/24 and converted to 320=
 MP3 before uploading to Soundcloud.  Other than fade ins and fade outs the=
 recordings are as/is from the recorders.  The comparison is here

http://soundcloud.com/g0sbw/at3032-mx391-dawn-chorus

I am finding it difficult to choose between them.  I think the ATs are more=
 detailed but the Shures seem warmer.

Cheers, TomR







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU