naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Naiant Mics: (It was "Opinions on AT 4022 Mic..."

Subject: Re: Naiant Mics: (It was "Opinions on AT 4022 Mic..."
From: "doctorobotnik" doctorobotnik
Date: Sat Mar 3, 2012 12:26 am ((PST))
No I haven't, Luis. I have a PFA phantom to plug-in power module which I'm =
very happy with, and am considering a Tinybox for my M10. It seems that Nai=
ant mics are very well regarded sonically, but being aimed at music rather =
than nature recording they are not super quiet (but not too bad - the U-O o=
mni is 15dBa).

--- In  Luis do Carmo <> wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> Have you tried the Naiant mics?
>
> Best,
> Luis
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: doctorobotnik <>
> To: 
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 5:36 AM
> Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: Opinions on AT 4022 Mic and ATI ML200 Pr=
e-Amp
>
>
> =C3=82=C2=A0
> Hi Fred,
>
> Another (very compact) idea to consider is Naiant's Tinybox preamp. EIN i=
s about -124dBu with the high-gain, low-noise option. P48 is supported. In =
its favour it's significantly cheaper than a MixPre, but with this comes a =
slight gain, noise and output level sacrifice.
>
> Jon who runs Naiant really knows his stuff and is very approachable. He c=
an put together a preamp tailored for the features you need. Good luck with=
 your system!
>
> Ben
>
> --- In  "Fred Bell" <listeningfor1@> wro=
te:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > All things being subjective, I would really value opinions on whether t=
his would be a successful arrangement for me.  A pair of Audio Technica AT4=
022s connected to an ATI ML200 pre-amp (with 48V phantom) then connected to=
 a Tascam DR-100 (utilizing the line input).  BTW, I already own the Tascam=
 recorder.  The recorder is OK, but I wished that I had known about this gr=
oup a year ago before the purchase.
> >
> > To get an idea of where I'm coming from, for the past year I've been us=
ing the Tascam with a single Sennheiser K6 (ME 66 capsule) for natural soun=
dscape recordings.  The mic is borrowed from a friend and eventually I'll h=
ave to return it.  When the sound level was high enough, I thought my recor=
dings where OK, not great but adequate.  I've learned by experience and rea=
ding that while the mic is really sensitive, it's a bit noisy.  I've also l=
earned that the Tascam's pre-amps are really noisy.
> >
> > I would like to expand to cleaner, stereo recordings.  But this is just=
 a hobby to me, and I only have about a thousand dollars to spend on mics a=
nd a pre-amp.  I've listen to some recordings made with the 4022s that soun=
ded great.  I plan to install the mics in a homemade SASS configuration.  I=
've also heard that using the Tascam recorder's line input is pretty clean,=
 too.  I haven't heard much about the ATI pre-amp.  Its specs seem good, bu=
t I'm not sure whether the phantom supply can power two 4022s or for how lo=
ng.  What do you guys think?  Is this a good mid-level approach or a mid-le=
vel waste of money?
> >
> > Thanks in advance!  The info that I've gleaned from this group has been=
 really helpful.
> >
> > Fred Bell
> >
>
>
>
>
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU