naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Pheasant call 7+ min

Subject: Re: Pheasant call 7+ min
From: "Peter Shute" pshute2
Date: Thu Mar 1, 2012 1:26 pm ((PST))
I find the problem of intermittent loud noises interesting, and I take note for 
future reference of your decision not to try to compress it. Would you have 
compressed it if it had only called once or twice?

I've been wondering about turning on the limiter on my Sony PCM M10, but 
haven't had time to test it. I'm wary of using something if I don't know if it 
might wreck a recording. Does it only kick in when the recording's about to be 
wrecked anyway, or does it affect quieter sounds too?

Peter Shute
From:  
 On Behalf Of Avocet
Sent: Thursday, 1 March 2012 12:22 PM
To: 
Subject: [Nature Recordists] Pheasant call 7+ min



I've put a pheasant call on my webpage with a site pic:

http://www.stowford.org/recordings.htm#pheasantlong

It calls for nearly 8 minutes. I was recording at a low level as
usual but the pheasant was very close and hit the limiter a few times.
I tried compressing the recording but it sounded bad so the "normal"
birdsong is quiet.

Mind you, they haven't got their spring voices yet but I've got a
blackbird which has picked up a phone ringtone. Had me doubling back
to the house a couple of times. Hope to get it closer soon but I'm
sure it's the bird I called "Intel" last year. The two frequencies it
uses are 1500Hz amd 2500Hz.

David

David Brinicombe
North Devon, UK
Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce












<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU