Dan,
This is wonderful!
I want to understand the physics of the delay issue with the hydrophones. I
assume that the delay would be best for the seperatation of the mics to mimic
the delay time in air. So, if the speed in air is 343 m/s and the speed in
fresh water is 1497 m/s then the correct seperation would be 4.36x the correct
spacing in air? That would be about 74cm for the hydrophones? Have I got this
right and will you get closer to the sound imaging we are used to?
Cheers,
Jason
--- In Dan Dugan <> wrote:
>
> On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:27 AM, NordicNature wrote:
>
> > Nice recording!
> > Have you tried to combine those two recordings on the same track?
> > If not, can you do that? :)
>
> Thanks for the compliments. I'll experiment. The hydrophones were about sixty
> feet out from the Jecklin array and about a hundred feet apart. There may be
> delay issues.
>
> The hydrophones were frozen in 8-inch thick ice, not in the water. I think
> the lake was quite shallow here.
>
> I don't use shockmounts on my Jecklin array because it stands on the ground.
> I've realized that in this case I was probably picking up conducted noise
> with the front array, too.
>
> -Dan
>
|