Subject: | Re: Mono to stereo |
---|---|
From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
Date: | Mon Jan 23, 2012 8:13 am ((PST)) |
<<It certainly wouldn't be the same as a stereo recording from the original= venue. Most particularly, if there were more than one direct source in the= original venue then both sources would appear to come from the same place. = But at least the reverberation would be natural sounding, and appropriate to th= e site.>> Right, it would provide some pleasing left-right differentiation, though no= true directionality. I would probably be more likely to create a multitrac= k pan-potted stereo out of several mono recordings from the same location r= ather than impose the ambience of a different location on my mono tracks. A= gain, it all depends on what the intended purpose is. Scott Fraser |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: wind protection options - any firm data?, umashankar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Telinga dish information -repost as did not get displayed, Klas Strandberg |
Previous by Thread: | Foam/rubber cylinder with integral faux fur cover in short length (Rycot=, Unknown |
Next by Thread: | Re: Mono to stereo, Gianni Pavan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU