naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

1. Re: New Soundscapes & realism

Subject: 1. Re: New Soundscapes & realism
From: "hartogj" hartogj
Date: Fri Jan 13, 2012 12:03 pm ((PST))
Hi Eric,

Regarding your list of "good" anthropogenic sounds, while all of those coul=
d be very important and beautiful sounds to record or otherwise document in=
 an ethnographic documentary context, they are outside the domain of nature=
 recording.  It is not whether a sound is beautiful or important that makes=
 it a nature sound.

It is easy for me to understand why a recording of songs of an indigenous c=
ulture would get rejected by a nature sound publisher, as that would be cul=
tural not natural in subject.

Going back to Robin's "Surely by now people realise..." assertion
arguing that that culture and nature are inseparable. While this is a valid=
 perspective to a point, it does not have much bearing on defining "nature =
recording".

At the most what this does is move the field of nature recording into a sub=
set of cultural recordings. Once we do that, we might as well consider the =
more general field of phonography or field recording is also inseparable fr=
om the cultural context.  A cultural context is assumed for all fields of s=
ound recording, and if anyone disagrees, please give an example where it is=
 not.

Even within a subset of ethnography, nature recording can still be defined =
aside from anthropogenic sounds. That is, a nature recording is a sound rec=
ording of a person or people quietly respecting the the sounds of nature.

...as quietly as they can anyway.



John Hartog
rockscallop.org





--- In  "Eric" <> wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> I'm not sure which "good" anthropogenic sounds Jos=E9 had in mind, but my=
 list would include speech, music, sonic art, and laughter, both intentiona=
l and unintentional.
>
> I seem to recall Steven Feld told us, in 1993, a nature environments reco=
rd label would have released his field recordings from the rain forests of =
c, only  if it hadn't been "ruined" by the sounds of the indigenous Bosavi =
people. He described their songs as more of conversation with everything li=
ving in the forest. I'd imagine his Voices of the Rainforest CD is an inspi=
ration for many in the Nature Recordists Group.
>
> All the best,
> Eric
>
> --- In  "hartogj" <hartogj_1999@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jose,
> > At least around here, in North America, many native animal species avoi=
d human presence. The greater the human presence the greater the impact on =
the habitat or ecosystem. Roads create swaths of lower animal diversity and=
 population size.  Any anthropogenic sounds associated with a human presenc=
e in an area that is considered to be "natural" I might consider "bad" for =
that natural ecosystem, and definitely "bad" for type of nature recording t=
hat I do. Of course transportation sounds from air and highway traffic are =
the worst. Through these sounds of our loud motors we extend our presence d=
eeply into even the most remote corners of our world.
> >
> > Can you give some examples of the "good" anthropogenic sounds you are r=
eferring to?
> >
> > John Hartog
> > rockscallop.org
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In  "freitojos" <josefreitas81@> w=
rote:
> > >
> > > Jonh,
> > > I think it is not a good thing to think all antropogenic sound is bad=
. The bad antropogenic sound is noise. We can't avoid antropogenic sounds a=
nd the naturescapes are antropogenic visualy here in Portugal, absolutely i=
mpossible to avoid it here in south europe. So it must exist good antropoge=
nic sound, I know it exists for shure in my memory. So in my recording I am=
 not going to avoid good antropogenic sound, I am going to avoid noise or b=
ad antropogenic sound. Recording soudscapes must be pedagogic in the sense =
that it can teach how to avoid make noise and make only good antropogenic s=
ound.
> > >
> > >  regards,
> > > Jos=E9
> >
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU