naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: What's this sound on this track? Bird or equipment fault?

Subject: Re: What's this sound on this track? Bird or equipment fault?
From: "chrishails50" chrishails50
Date: Sat Nov 12, 2011 1:02 am ((PST))


Hi Peter, I know nothing about Australian quails but like David my guess is=
 that this is bird sound, probably part of their alarm sequence, I looked a=
t the spctrogram and the two flight sounds are the same frequency (about 3.=
2 KHz)as the landing calls with no evidence of mechanical sounds.

Earlier this year I stumbled across Hazelhens and was astonished at the thi=
n high-ptched calls they made: http://tinyurl.com/3lzqvzo  not as robust as=
 one might expect from this family.

Chris
http://www.wildechoes.org

--- In  Peter Shute <> wrote:
>
> Thanks very much for that. I hadn't thought of listening to it slowed dow=
n, so I'll have to give that a try.
>
> My memory is that there was a very clear vocalisation at or before it too=
k off, and I was surprised that it wasn't obvious on the recording. I'm won=
dering now if this is simply because the ME66 was pointing forwards and the=
 bird was almost at my feet, making its recorded volume much lower than I e=
xpected. I'll  have to try to remember to point it down more next time I tr=
y this.
>
> What do you mean by "listening to the reverb"? How do you do that? Is it =
obvious at low speed?
>
> Peter Shute
> ________________________________
> From:  =
ps.com] On Behalf Of Avocet
> Sent: Monday, 7 November 2011 1:07 PM
> To: 
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] What's this sound on this track? Bird or=
 equipment fault?
>
>
>
> > I recorded the sound of a quail being flushed, and there's this odd,
> > very brief squeak ...
>
> Peter,
>
> I slowed down the recording 4 and then 16 times and listened on a loop
> play. There is a double vocalisation near the start, and what is
> almost certainly a second double vocalistion as it departed. The
> rhythm of its wingbeats was unbroken and there are no gaps except for
> very brief pauses between the wingbeats so I don't suspect a hiccup in
> the recording. The clincher was listening to the reverb which
> accompanied both vocalisations and remained consistent.
>
> If it was mic or mount noise, I would have expected an LF blip at that
> point, so I reckon it's all bird generated sounds. The wingbeats are
> all "hard" suggesting that they may have been touching or at least
> strongly "feathering" as is normal with take-off flight like a chicken
> or pigeon. This can be quite squeaky sometimes, but not like the
> vocalisations.
>
> David
>
> David Brinicombe
> North Devon, UK
> Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce
>
>
>
>
>
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU