| Subject: | Re: mkh800 vs. mkh8040 |
|---|---|
| From: | "emil klotzsch" onomatopoetik |
| Date: | Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:16 pm ((PDT)) |
would be interesting to hear the difference in sound or at least have someone tell about it. and the selfnoise.. the mkh800 has 12dba, the 8040 13dbs, so this should be similar, but the sensitivity from the 800 is 40mv/pa and the 8040 just 20.. anybody can give me a hint? Am 15.07.2011 um 22:06 schrieb emil klotzsch: > has anybody made a side by side comparison between the sennheiser > mkh800 and the mkh8040? > > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 1. Re: Best stereo solution for nature recording while backpacking thro, Kevin Colver |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Attack of the Bullbats, David Kuhn |
| Previous by Thread: | mkh800 vs. mkh8040, emil klotzsch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mkh800 vs. mkh8040, Fred Fiedler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU