| Subject: | Re: Zaxcom Nomad at NAB |
|---|---|
| From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
| Date: | Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:48 am ((PDT)) |
<<Hmmm.... 48k @ 24 bit for 4ooo+ USD. ???> <It seems that the manufacturers and users of pro gear have finally accepted that the sample rates of 96 and 192 kHz have no real benefit for common audio recording... >> Zaxcom markets specifically to the film & TV production world which has scant interest nor time for sample rate conversion in post production. It's simply not a market where anyone can afford the luxury of being precious about a theoretical quality advantage when the acoustic conditions under which they record are generally already far worse than 16 bit 44.1k. In many cases these guys are struggling to get even 3 dB of dialog precedence over the background ambience. Scott Fraser |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Zaxcom Nomad at NAB, Raimund |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Mix Pre, Michael Raphael |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Zaxcom Nomad at NAB, Raimund |
| Next by Thread: | Mix Pre, Michael Raphael |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU