naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Aspen Grove with the Jeklin Disk

Subject: Re: Aspen Grove with the Jeklin Disk
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio
Date: Wed Oct 6, 2010 9:20 pm ((PDT))
At 12:55 AM +0000 10/7/10, hartogj wrote:
>
>
>
>>  By "fold" are you referring to possible reflections from the barrier
>>  back onto the mics?
>
>Hi Rob,
>
>No. I will try to explain, though maybe I am insane. When I play a 
>stereo recording through loudspeakers or headphones I hear 
>everything in front of me. The sounds that were to the rear of the 
>microphones are now to the front. That is what I mean by folding. 
>Almost every sound that is folded in this manner is likely to be 
>dissimilar except at the extreme sides where broad sourced sounds 
>can fold in on themselves. What affect would this have on the 
>resultant recording?
>
>John Hartog

Hi John--

Yes, the known trait of front-rear confusion. What are you asking 
about it exactly?

Are you thinking that almost equal amplitude sensitivity to the rear 
contributes more to the effect of the bass being more centralized 
around the speakers with Jecklin? It could some above 500 Hz, but 
response to the lowest octaves I'm discussing is very 
omni-directional for most arrays.

Front-rear confusion typically becomes a concern when one wishes to 
locate sound sources accurately opposed to capturing as many events 
as clearly as possible.  For example SASS produces (a) significantly 
lower amplitude when the sound arrives at angles greater than 90 
degrees off axis. (b)  tonality that is noticeably warmer and (c) 
depth cues (such as reflections from surfaces in front of the array). 
M-S arrays with a cardiod mid mic produce some of the (a) and (b) 
effects.  X-Y and ORTF with cardioid mics do as well.

Front-back distinction with Perpendicular to Boundary arrays is a 
challenge and therefore these arrays are good when wants to pick-up 
sounds from the rear with almost equal clarity. Blumlein is very good 
for this too.  Jecklin Disk and Spaced Omnis  produce less of the (a) 
and (b) effects than M-S and X-Y in my opinion.

Large diaphragm mics are inherently more directional and tend to 
produce less front-back confusion (except for Rode NT2000's which are 
actually hotter at 90 degrees than at 0 degrees in omni mode).  Rob D.

-- 







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU