Subject: | Sony PCM-D50, PCM-D1 or Sound Devices 702? |
---|---|
From: | "Peter A" remoteportal |
Date: | Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:31 am ((PDT)) |
Hello! I'm very exited to start making nature recordings of streams, storms, rain,= crickets, etc., that are all very quiet and subtle sounds. I've read all the reviews on Amazon and I'm just about ready to pull the tr= igger on the D50. However, I've read that the D1 is even quieter (a lower = "sound floor") but it's 3x-4x the cost. Money is tight but I want to buy the right gear the first time. I hear the= Sound Devices 702 is the best but it's about $3K once you buy a decent ste= reo microphone, etc. I guess my question is this... is the D50 "good enough" to get into nature = recording or is the D1 and 702 just so much better to justify the greatly a= dditional cost? Pete |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Hydrophonia Sound Art Contest, corticalsongs |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Sony PCM-D50, PCM-D1 or Sound Devices 702?, corticalsongs |
Previous by Thread: | The Ovenbird, Martyn Stewart |
Next by Thread: | Re: Sony PCM-D50, PCM-D1 or Sound Devices 702?, corticalsongs |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU