Rob,
Isn't it technically a shuffler ?
LR-> MS <EQ e.g side for wide/narrow mid for tone> MS -> LR
boundary to reduce > 2 Khz.
-Mike.
--- In Marcus Buick <> wrote:
>
> [Yes. The DAW mixers also have channel buttons/nserts where one can
> "stack" a few or many digital processing loops or "plug-ins." I use
> the above-mentioned stack so often and refer to it often enough that
> I've been trying to find for a catchy but somewhat accurate
> abbreviation for the three plug-in stack/configuration,.. Rob D.]
>
> Ahhh. . .I see. Perhaps, 'sandwitch' or more appropriately, a 'Dagwood'.=
> 'Stack' might make more sense though.
>
> ~Marcus
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Rob Danielson <>
> To:
> Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 11:05:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] M/S recording setup
>
>
> At 9:53 AM -0700 8/17/10, Marcus Buick wrote:
> >re:
> >[I've pondered if there's something we can call the intra-stereo input
> >channel mixer "patch" that has an EQ plug inserted between two
> >+Matrix plugs? Rob D.]
> >
> >Some professional studio consoles have an 'insert' patch for each module=
. That
> >allows one to 'insert' an outboard processor such as an EQ or
> >compressor between
> >the mic-pre and the console output. Is this what you mean?
> >
> >~Marcus
> >
>
> Hi Marcus--
> Yes. The DAW mixers also have channel buttons/nserts where one can
> "stack" a few or many digital processing loops or "plug-ins." I use
> the above-mentioned stack so often and refer to it often enough that
> I've been trying to find for a catchy but somewhat accurate
> abbreviation for the three plug-in stack/configuration,.. Rob D.
>
> =3D =3D =3D
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|