Subject: | Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size |
---|---|
From: | "Raimund" animalsounds |
Date: | Tue May 18, 2010 12:22 am ((PDT)) |
David Steinwedel wrote: > Higher sampling rates have the advantage of being more manipulatable. The= y will sound better when pitched down or otherwise processed. Yep, I recently recorded foraging Noctule bats with my SONY PCM-M10 (with i= ts internal mics) at a sample rate of 96 kHz. Visit http://tinyurl.com/28gsn3o and click at '100515_22.WAV' to play the o= riginal file (one can hear only a distant Nightingale and a Cuckoo). Then c= lick at the lilac-colored dot ('slowed down 100515_22.WAV') to play a slowe= d-down version of the file (sample rate afterwards set to 11.025 kHz) that = reveals the calls of the Noctules. Regards, Raimund |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, jtudor2005 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Tascam DR-680 noise test?, David Michael |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, jtudor2005 |
Next by Thread: | [Nature Recordists] Choosing the right sampling rate and sample si=, Richard Folwell |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU