8. Re: from metadata to archiving - georeferencing .wav files in bat su

["Raimund" animalsounds]

John Lundsten wrote:

> Sorry i don't follow your thinking here. The sample count since midnight=

> idea in a BWF is to cover a 24hr period, if you aren't covering a single =
day
> then it isn't a BWF.
>  A 64bit int word surely gives plenty enough numbers for a 24hr period ev=
en
> if you are counting at 250k/sec. I think approx 2.E+10 is all that is req=
 &
> 2.E+19 are available.
> John L

Sure, but the 'bext' chunk implemented in the Avisoft-RECORDER software doe=
s not claim to excactly comply with the BWF standard. It should be consider=
ed just as an additional 'nice to have' feature because it is not essential=
 for its primary use.

The analysis software (Avisoft-SASLab Pro) that is recommended for processi=
ng these files does not use the bext chunk at all (it instead uses the othe=
r application-specific RIFF chunks 'TIME' and 'GPS).

Regards,
Raimund