naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Some prescient words from Murray Schafer

Subject: Re: Some prescient words from Murray Schafer
From: "Mark Brennan" markbrennanfinear=
t
Date: Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:29 pm ((PDT))

Its an interesting discussion and I have seen similar conversations or =E2=
=80=98arguments=E2=80=99 in the art world also. Some of the greatest works =
of art were made by the poorest but most inspired artists. At the time of c=
reation though, the artist was moved to =E2=80=98say something=E2=80=99 reg=
ardless of the materials or equipment used. You can also assume the same fo=
r the photographic media in which many of the greatest photographs were not=
 staged but the photographer was in the right place at the right time. Litt=
le did artist or photographer know what value their work had years down the=
 road.
I don=E2=80=99t think its really for =E2=80=98us=E2=80=99 to judge unless w=
e are looking at the recordings from a purely technical perspective, even t=
hen someone recording something can only use the materials available to the=
m at the time. Some of the most grainiest, technically poor photographs bec=
ame the most famous and valuable.
There are many things that I think make up good =E2=80=98art=E2=80=99 or ev=
en a good recording, technical ability, equipment used, location, inspirati=
on, recording style, the passion from within but I think most of all pressi=
ng the =E2=80=98red=E2=80=99 button on the machine has to be number 1, with=
out it, there is nothing. But the flip side of the coin is that I can under=
stand both sides of the argument, there are millions of photographs taken e=
veryday, many of them portraying things of no interest to many of us but so=
meone out there, in years to come, might get a sense of what it was like to=
 live in =E2=80=98our age=E2=80=99. Is there a deeper message here? do we a=
s recordists or artists want to tell the world that we existed, that we mad=
e an effort, that we said something and I think to =E2=80=98say something=
=E2=80=99 with our work is key.
Lastly, museums have come to collect what they deem to be important art, ph=
otographs, relics, recordings etc, there are also sound libraries and I thi=
nk it=E2=80=99s the job of the curator to deem which sounds should be archi=
ved but then again, they are not always right either. Here is a fascinating=
 collection from the BBC, well worth a look, We all have our reasons for do=
ing this, my own perspective is that I think nature recording is extremely =
important in these times of environmental degradation. I have tried fightin=
g the clear cut loggers, the sprayers and the developers=E2=80=A6 I suppose=
 I feel obligated to record what I feel is disappearing in the natural worl=
d, right or wrong, it doesn=E2=80=99t really matter does it. I would be int=
erested to know why others on the list get up at all hours and go our in al=
l weather to record? Is there a common theme?
=E3=80=80
Cheers
Mark
Nova Scotia
Canada
http://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/sound_archive.shtml



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU