| Subject: | Re: Sony PCM recorders |
|---|---|
| From: | "Chris Edwards" chris2edwards |
| Date: | Tue Apr 6, 2010 10:34 am ((PDT)) |
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, renberg19z wrote: | I'm new to field recording and am shopping for a recorder and was hoping= | for some advice. I think I've narrowed it down to the Sony PCM-D50 and | the PCM-M10. Here's what I make of it: | | PCM-M10, pros: compact enough to fit comfortably into a jeans pocket, | $200 or so cheaper, cons: weaker preamps and internal mics than its big | brother. | | PCM-D50, pros: better sound quality (or so I gather...), cons: bulkier, | more expensive. | | Pros for both: both are much praised for near-prof. quality at a | sub-$500 price point. Cons for both: lack of XLR inputs and phantom | power. Hi, Oryoki posted this useful comparison between PCM-D50 and PCM-M10: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/message/38965 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Sony PCM recorders, renberg19z |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Sony PCM recorders, Shirane Sanzan |
| Previous by Thread: | Sony PCM recorders, renberg19z |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Sony PCM recorders, Shirane Sanzan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU