| Subject: | 4. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test |
|---|---|
| From: | "Chris Edwards" chris2edwards |
| Date: | Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:58 am ((PST)) |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Robin wrote: | Chris Edwards wrote: | | > Hmmm - but I thought the D50 was cardioid and the M10 was omni. | | Yes, that's true, which is why the D50 has the noisier mics, which poorer frequency response as well. Oops - yes of course. Despite having re-read the original a couple of times before posting, I managed to get this scrambled. Sorry for confusion, folks. I'm blaming poor concentration on the autumn/winter season here, with too few birdies to record :-( |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 3. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, Scott Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 5. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, Raimund |
| Previous by Thread: | 4. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, Raimund |
| Next by Thread: | 4. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, oryoki2000 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU