Subject: | Re: Sony PCM-M10 first impressions |
---|---|
From: | "lerake" lerake |
Date: | Tue Nov 3, 2009 10:13 am ((PST)) |
--- In Rob Danielson <> wrote: > > Hi Ernst, > As you seem to be predicting, narrow. The M10's cousins, the D-50 and > D-1 and other pocket recorders with minimally separated mics were > compared by Matt Blaze and commented upon by group members: > http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/naturerecordists/2009-07/msg00237.html > or > http://tinyurl.com/ydyhzs6 > Click on the "thread" button and you can walk through the posts and > get the link to the tests. > Rob D. > Hi Rob, Yes, but those at least are cardioids, so you get a more 'traditional' stereo image (XY, etc.). I'm pretty surprised to see Sony move to omnis with this recorder; it doesn't seem to make any sense. I'll be really interested to hear any comparison recordings between this and the other Sonys, or between what seems to be its closest competitor in size, price, and audio quality, the Edirol R09-HR.... -Ernst |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Sony PCM-M10 first impressions, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Sony PCM-M10 first impressions, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Sony PCM-M10 first impressions, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Sony PCM-M10 first impressions, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU