Subject: | 5. Re: High Sample Rates |
---|---|
From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
Date: | Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:08 am ((PDT)) |
<<because higher sample rates mean less quantization noise - at least in theory >> Actually the quantizing noise is a function of bit depth rather than sample rate. This is why 24bit is preferred over 16bit, but again "at least in theory", since no analog electronics will ever be able to portray the full dynamic range inherent in a 24bit data stream. It is also possible for a high sample rate to measure worse for noise than a low sample rate due to the various noise shaping schemes used by different ADC manufacturers which shift the noise energy into a less perceptible ultrasonic range, in which case the audible results are much better than the lab measurements. Scott Fraser |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 4. Re: High Sample Rates, Marinos Koutsomichalis |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 6. Re: High Sample Rates, Scott Fraser |
Previous by Thread: | 5. Re: High Sample Rates, John Hartog |
Next by Thread: | 6. Re: High Sample Rates, Curt Olson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU