| Subject: | 5. Re: High Sample Rates |
|---|---|
| From: | "John Hartog" hartogj |
| Date: | Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:09 pm ((PDT)) |
Hi Dan, I admit I know little or nothing about the ways ultrasonic sounds might aff= ect humans =96 just, these CD vs other audio format listening tests pertain= only to perceptible aesthetics. John Hartog > Sure, but in the case of hearing there is only one study that claims > to show ultrasonic bandwidth affects humans, and that study is > questionable. > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 4. Re: High Sample Rates, Raimund Specht |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 6. Re: High Sample Rates, Curt Olson |
| Previous by Thread: | 4. Re: High Sample Rates, Raimund Specht |
| Next by Thread: | 5. Re: High Sample Rates, Scott Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU