Good point Marinos,
It's not just the sample rate but everything that comes before it as well..=
.
Grant.
--- In Marinos Koutsomichalis <=
.> wrote:
>
> At least in theory,
> recording in high sample rates improves the quality of the signal
> because of less quantization artifacts
>
> bare in mind also that most of the times the question is not on the
> sampling rate but on the actual overall quality of the convertors !
> even if you record the same material at the same sampling rate with
> different convertors you will probably get different results ! the
> fact that a zoom H2 can record @ 96Khz doesn' t mean that this will
> sound better than a nagra working on 44,100 even if you let aside the =
> quality of the pre-amps. Actually it doesn' t even means that it
> will have all these high frequencies we are talking about, I am not
> convinced that a machine that cheap for example is really able to do
|