Re: FR2 vs FR2-LE

Subject:	Re: FR2 vs FR2-LE
From:	"Max Catterwell" oatcruncher
Date:	Mon Aug 3, 2009 4:20 am ((PDT))

Hi again all!
OK, I've just posted another two clips that Rob has graciously agreed to an=
alyse for me. The FR2 clip on this set doesn't have the PS hum! Also, the e=
lectric clock was turned off.
Max


--- In  "Max Catterwell" <=
.> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob!
> OK, I have posted the two requested clips. These are in a folder I create=
d called FR2 and FR2-LE clips by Max. They were both at 16/48 with all gain=
 at maximum, and are the 'cleanest' I could find. One thing I missed was an=
 electric clock about six feet away from the mics. Bye the way, in case it'=
s relevant, the mics are set in a wooden Olsen type barrier array at the mo=
ment; I'm assuming this is not of concern.
> I look forward to any comments or analysis with great interest, even if i=
t turns out to be what I don't want to hear!
> All the best
> Max
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: FR2 vs FR2-LE, Max Catterwell <= Re: FR2 vs FR2-LE, Rob Danielson Re: FR2 vs FR2-LE, Max Catterwell Re: FR2 vs FR2-LE, Rob Danielson

Previous by Date:	Re: Mystery Sound Posted, Jim Morgan
Next by Date:	Re: FR2 vs FR2-LE, Rob Danielson
Previous by Thread:	Philadelphia thunderstorm, Matt Blaze
Next by Thread:	Re: FR2 vs FR2-LE, Rob Danielson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU