Subject: | 4. Re: file types Hi HZ subjects? |
---|---|
From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
Date: | Thu May 14, 2009 8:50 am ((PDT)) |
<<Another issue that is often overlooked is that the 24 bit format option on most recorders provides only a relatively small increase of dynamic range compared to 16 bit.>> That is due to the molecular noise inherent in the analog portion of the A to D converter electronics imposing an unavoidable & absolute limit. The greatest signal to noise ratio attainable, above absolute zero, is approximately equivalent to a 21bit word length. Longer word lengths simply contain extra bits of noise, so although we have 24bit words in out data stream we can never truly attain 24bits of dynamic range. Nevertheless, digital storage is so cheap there is no compelling reason not to record at 24bits, especially when post production signal processing will be applied. Scott Fraser |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 3. Re: file types Hi HZ subjects?, Raimund Specht |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 5. Re: file types Hi HZ subjects?, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Shipping, Refunds, Warranties, and mods (no more), Martyn Stewart |
Next by Thread: | 5. Re: file types Hi HZ subjects?, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU