Subject: | Dumb question- do you absolutely need to record sounds at 'high' lev |
---|---|
From: | "Dave A." taijidave |
Date: | Fri May 8, 2009 4:25 pm ((PDT)) |
Hi all-- I have a Dumb Question- do you absolutely need to record sounds at 'high' l= evel...? Esp. if you're using a digital recorder? I know that the original reason for recording at high levels, ie w/ analog = equipment, was to raise the signal as much as possible above the noise floo= r, which usually was the tape transport/etc. But now, if we're recording di= gital, & whatever noise is generated by the pre's anyway, then what's the d= ifference between recording w/ lots of gain in the field... vs. just adding= gain later in 'post? Ie, are good pre's able to add significant gain w/o increasing relative noi= se, ie something which you couldn't do in 'post (eg. a 'gain' increase made= in post would increase both signal & noise equally). I've tested the difference on some live music &/or lectures I've been recor= ding, & can't tell the difference... so does this make a bigger difference = with very quiet original sounds? TIA, dave |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: PMD 620 firmware A2.33 ... ?, Dave A. |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Dumb question- do you absolutely need to record sounds at 'high', Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Photos of my stereo rig uploaded, obSession |
Next by Thread: | Re: Dumb question- do you absolutely need to record sounds at 'high', Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU