Hi Steve and others,
The low Hz stuff in some settings might be mostly man made noise, while in =
other settings mostly natural. Sometimes the VLF caries the most interestin=
g part of a recording.
Released energies from distant wind or water coalesce into dynamic low freq=
uency pulses. These natural rhythms offer a sense of magnitude and distance=
, and subliminal reminders of the powerful forces of nature shaping the lan=
d.
I approach each recording case by case, but sometimes I treat the LF as the=
foundation, and test adjust the channel balance there first, and EQ so the=
LF content is still present but does not overwhelm or detract from the ove=
rall subject.
John Hartog
--- In "Steve Pelikan" <> wrot=
e:
>
> Friends:
>
> This is a subject that has been touched on often but never discussed expl=
icitly (in my memory) and that is low frequency filtering of "ambient" reco=
rdings.
>
> I've started to get interested in making stereo recordings of entire "sou=
nd scapes" --- meaning whatever is there --- and am in the process of decid=
ing how I'll treat such recordings --- so I'd appreciate other people's opi=
nions.
>
> My understanding of the 'elevated' low Hz 'noise' in most settings is tha=
t most of it (that I experience) is low Hz man made noise that carries a lo=
ng way because of its wave length ( Hi Hz interacts with "stuff" and disapp=
ears rather quickly with distance).
>
> When I'm out to document things I record w/o filters. This is in the east=
ern US where there's lots of manmade sound. When I want something that "sou=
nds nice" I use (or process with) a low Hz filter (10 dB to 20 db/ octave s=
tarting at 160 -600 Hz, say).
>
> I've heard "professional" recording with _nothing_ below 200 Hz
> and they sound goofy to me. I've been tempted to filter recordings more =
heavily but realized that it (for eg) might eliminate low Hz thumps of a w=
oodpecker on a rotten stump.
>
> How do you al think about this issue? What do you do?
>
> Sometimes I put on a low Hz filter so I can set the overall record level =
higher (buy headroom by eliminating something under 100 Hz). Sometimes I re=
ally miss the low Hz stuff.
>
> Sorry for this elementary and ambiguous posting/question but it think th=
ere is room for some discussion on this topic. In the end we all need to li=
sten carefully and do what sounds best for a particular setting, but I'm cu=
rious if there is a general understanding about this matter.
>
> Cheers! (and Good Recording! which others have used and seems a superior =
salutation)
>
> Steve P
>
|