naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

1. Re: terminology, was Re: Speakers for Editing

Subject: 1. Re: terminology, was Re: Speakers for Editing
From: "obSession" melvoid2002
Date: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:50 am ((PDT))
No, that's a pornography site... but I can't view those 'cuz I don't have a
pornograph.




On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:14 PM, John Tudor <> wrote:

>    --- In <naturerecordists%40yahoogroups=
.com>,
> "escalation746" <> wrote:
> >
> > Lou Judson wrote:
> >
> > > Curiosity about "Phonography" as a term.
> >
> > I think it's an odd term myself. I always think of "phonograph" which
> makes me think it's something related to either turntablism or musique
> concrete!
> >
>
> My wife thought I was looking up sites with naked women when she first
> caught me on a 'Phonography' site
>
>
>









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 1. Re: terminology, was Re: Speakers for Editing, obSession <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU