| Subject: | 4. Re: terminology |
|---|---|
| From: | "Lou Judson" inaudio |
| Date: | Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:08 am ((PDT)) |
Think "polygraph" <L> On Mar 29, 2009, at 6:52 AM, Bernie Krause wrote: Technically, that is correct, Greg. Just sounds a bit awkward since, when used as a suffix, "graph" has evolved to embody more of a visual representation than a reference to writing, although that was it's original connotation according the the OED. Bernie On Mar 29, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Greg Simmons wrote: > --- In Bernie Krause <> > wrote: > >> Nevermind the digital era. > > If we consider that phonography means 'sound writing', |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 3. Re: terminology, Bernie Krause |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 5. Re: terminology, Philip Tyler |
| Previous by Thread: | Whoops, Marc Myers |
| Next by Thread: | 5. Re: terminology, Philip Tyler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU