naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

5. Re: Speakers for Editing

Subject: 5. Re: Speakers for Editing
From: "jasonpudd" jasonpudd
Date: Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:11 pm ((PDT))
Bernie,

Thanks for the detailed advice on the speakers and room design.  It is grea=
t to get all the excellent help from everyone.  I am starting to track down=
 some of the sources of these choices here and some acoustic tile too!

Thanks again.

Jason

--- In  Bernie Krause <> wrote:
>
> A couple of things about rooms and monitoring learned from music days: =

> The room, here, has no parallel surfaces. Built inexpensively with the =

> help of friends, the converted double garage space was designed so
> that the ceiling is not parallel to the floor and the walls are offset =

> in relationship to each other and then partially covered with acoustic =

> tiling. The floor is carpeted and I've made some baffles that
> additionally control sound dispersal in the room. Three types of
> speaker monitors pairs, Meyer HD1s, B&W Matrix, and RCF 5S, in
> descending order of quality/price are used interchangeably to get
> different perspectives on each mix. The room was acoustivoiced so that =

> sound at the "sweet spot" of the mix is flat and measurably reliable
> with no standing waves. Ultimately, though, if the product passes with =

> the RCF 5S system, the least expensive of all and the ones we favor
> for our public space installations (museums, aquarium, zoos =96 both
> outdoor and indoor spaces since they can be immersed in a bucket of
> water and still work)  it goes out the door. These small bookshelf
> speakers, originally made in Italy, then taken over by Mackie (EAW),
> cost around $120 - $180USD, are rated at 175W, and really quite
> remarkable for their size, quality and cost.
>
> That said, every person ultimately arrives at their own favorite
> system that provides the resonance they are seeking. This includes mic =

> systems, recorder, and mixing components. Find something you like and =

> that fits your budget and go for it. No one has a call on what the
> "ultimate" is or should be.
>
> Bernie
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 22, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Dan Dugan wrote:
>
> > Bravo, Rob, for going the whole way. Monitoring is your ears, you can
> > only hear your work as well as your monitors will permit. For
> > production, the money should go into mics and monitors--it's
> > transduction that's the difficult part.
> >
> > If you make any filtering or equalization decisions about your
> > recordings, monitoring is critical.
> >
> > I second the recommendation to put the speakers out in the room, away
> > from the walls. And I always equalize a monitor system. A programmable
> > DSP box is the way to go nowadays.
> >
> > -Dan Dugan
> >
> >
>
> Wild Sanctuary
> POB 536
> Glen Ellen, CA 95442
> 707-996-6677
> http://www.wildsanctuary.com
> 
> Google Earth zooms: http://earth.wildsanctuary.com
> SKYPE: biophony
>
>
>
>
>
>
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU